Do you know about - Tax Tips For Horse business Disruptions in the Thoroughbred manufactures
It's fair to say that the past few years have thrown up some grand challenges to anything trying to run a primary production business in regional Australia.
What I said. It isn't outcome that the true about State Farm Insurance. You see this article for information about that want to know is State Farm Insurance.How is Tax Tips For Horse business Disruptions in the Thoroughbred manufactures
These challenges go beyond financial and economic upheavals such as the Gfc, the stronger dollar and constant volatility on global share markets. What I'm talking about are the dreaded "natural disasters" that periodically disrupt the businesses of primary producers, e.g. Viruses, droughts, floods and bushfires.
It's not well known that our tax laws consist of concessions that help victims of these disruptions to cope financially straight through these difficult periods. It makes the job of an Accountant that diminutive bit more rewarding when we can pass on and apply these concessions, too.
This article will figure and discuss the concessions and a few tax tips that I consider most relevant for horse owners and breeders caught up in these circumstances. Even if you can't use them when preparing your 2011 tax return, I'm hoping you can tell a friend or two who needs some welcome good news after all that nature has thrown up to him or her recently.
1. Guarnatee Recoveries for loss of livestock can be spread over 5 years
If a taxation breeder receives an Guarnatee recovery for a loss of ''live stock'' or for a loss of trees by fire, the tax act provides the breeder with an election to spread the estimation of that revenue over five years. However, the election is available only if the relevant live stock or trees are held as assets of a ''primary production business''.
N.B. This concession is not available to those who guide a "stand-alone" racing activity, without any related breeding.
Example
Peter has his breeding asset in Toowoomba and lost his prized broodmare in the new Qld floods.
The mare was insured for 0,000 and these proceeds were duly received in March 2011. Peter's cash-flow has been severely affected by the floods and he has diminutive appetite for paying tax on this revenue until he can get some yearlings to the sales in the next few years.
To lessen the tax impact, Peter elects to spread his Guarnatee recovery over 5 years, i.e. 0,000/5 yrs = ,000 p.a. Accordingly, ,000 was returned in Fy 2011 and in each of the next four tax years.
2. Guarnatee received re destruction of a building is treated as capital proceeds
Many business related buildings were been destroyed as a succeed of the new floods, bushfires etc.
The Guarnatee recovered as a succeed of these occurrences are not returned as revenue in the year received, instead they are treated as the capital proceeds on the disposal of these assets.
Where an asset, or part of an asset is lost or destroyed, any proceeds received by a taxpayer under an Guarnatee procedure in respect of the loss or destruction are taken to be amounts of money received "as a succeed of or in respect of" the disposal of the asset or part of that asset. N.B. If an asset, or part of an asset was acquired before 20 September 1985, no part of the proceeds received in relation to that asset or part of that asset, would be branch to Capital Gains Tax (Cgt).
Similarly, where a motor car is lost or destroyed, any Guarnatee recovery will be observation in respect of the disposal of that motor vehicle, and so not branch to Cgt.
Example
A breeding business acquires possession of a newly constructed building on 1 July 1986.
The cost base of the building is million and the building is treated as a separate asset for Cgt purposes.
The building was subsequently destroyed by fire and the breeder lodged a claim under an Guarnatee policy. At the time of acquisition, the taxpayer entered into an Guarnatee trade that would cover the taxpayer for the change cost of the building. The change cost at date of destruction is million.
The Guarnatee payout of million is taken to be the observation on disposal of the building and, thus, is not 100% dutible in the year received.
"Roll-over relief" under section the Cgt act may be available where a change asset is acquired with the Guarnatee proceeds, i.e. The Cgt cost base of the change asset is reduced by the behalf on disposal of the building. In the above scenario, the behalf would be million ( million Guarnatee proceeds less million cost base)
3. Guarnatee received for assets that are part of a "Small business Depreciation Pool"
Many smaller breeders claim depreciation using the small business depreciation pool.
For the record, a Small business Entity (Sbe) is a tax business with ordinarily less than m aggregated turnover p.a.
If in the event of Guarnatee received for the destruction of assets, note:
The pool balance is reduced by the extent of Guarnatee received. Thus a behalf or loss on the items destroyed need not be made when the Guarnatee is received; and
If the sum of the Guarnatee received of assets disposed of while the revenue year exceeds the pool conclusion balance for the year, the excess is branch to taxation.
Example
Janet the breeder lost critical sheds in the 2009 Vic bushfires.
The conclusion depreciation pool balance of her business at 30 June 2009, was ,500. Guarnatee received for her sheds was ,000. Accordingly, ,500 (,000 less ,500) is dutible revenue to the business in the Fy 2009.
4. Assets branch to "Roll-Over Relief" due to destruction
As noted above in a Cgt context, "Roll-over relief" occurs where profits on disposal of assets, e.g. Where Guarnatee proceeds exceed the written-down value of asset, can be deferred. In relation to a business asset, this is where the behalf is offset against the cost of the change asset, instead of being declared as revenue immediately.
In short, yes, a breeder is able to gather roll-over relief for an asset which was involuntarily destroyed by fire, flood etc. Provided the following conditions are satisfied:
The asset was not a pooled asset under the "Small business Entity" (Sbe) regime or as part of a low-value pool for non-Sbe taxpayers; and The taxpayer acquires a change asset within the required times
Example
Big Breeder Pty Ltd, who does not qualify as a "Small business Entity", had a float destroyed in the Victorian floods of 2011.
Insurance proceeds received in Fy 2011 was ,000, the written-down value of the float at time of destruction was ,000, thus a behalf on disposal of ,000 was realised.
A change float was acquired for ,000, within only 3 months of the event, well within the 12 month required time frame, which commences on 30 June 2011.
Instead of Big Breeder having to sound the ,000 as a behalf in Fy 2011, what it does instead is to sell out the cost base of the new depreciable asset to ,000 (,000 cost less ,000 behalf on the destroyed asset).
5. Assets that can be written-off immediately
In many instances, business plant and tool is not insured and no proceeds are received.
Where this occurs, the tax "written-down" value of the asset can be immediately written-off, this being an immediate deduction in the tax year this occurs.
However, it should be noted that only a "non-Sbe" can take advantage of this concession as they are not be eligible to use "pooling" for their business assets.
Example
Big Breeder Pty Ltd chooses not to insure any of its "on-farm" motor bikes.
All of these bikes were "written-off" as unrecoverable after the Vic floods.
The tax written-down value of its bikes at the date of destruction was ,000. As no Guarnatee was received, an immediate ,000 deduction can be claimed for these assets in that tax year.
6. "Loss of income" Guarnatee is dutible to the breeder
Where Guarnatee payments are received to replace lost income, the proceeds are dutible to the breeder (e.g. business interruption Guarnatee which ordinarily provides cash flow until business profits reach what they were before the fire. Flood etc.).
7. Dealing with the destruction of trading stock
a) Can a horse be written-off if no proceeds received?
A breeder is entitled to claim a deduction for the cost of trading stock destroyed.
The deduction is obtained via the movement in the opportunity and conclusion stock provision.
b) Tax profits from "forced" disposal of stock
Under the tax act, where a primary production business is forced to arrange of or destroy livestock, the breeder may be entitled to concessional treatment in relation to any resulting tax profit, as follows:
spread the tax profits over 5 revenue year; or defer the tax behalf and offset it against the cost of change stock over the subsequent 5 revenue years.
This relief relates to the forced sale of livestock, and differs to the relief re spreading Guarnatee recoveries over 5 years, which relates to the death of livestock.
However, this election will not be available where the business is sold following the natural disaster.
Example - spreading the tax profit
Breedco's yearlings have to be destroyed because of the new Hendra virus.
The Guarnatee proceeds of the forced disposal are 0,000 and the tax behalf is 0,000. Breedco elects to spread the tax behalf over five years. Breedco's dutible revenue in the disposal year includes an estimate of 0,000 in respect of the disposal. This estimate is arrived at by reducing the proceeds of 0,000 by the tax behalf of 0,000 and adding an estimate of ,000 (i.e. 20% of the tax behalf of 0,000). For each of the four revenue years following the disposal year, Breedco must consist of an estimate of ,000 in its dutible income.
c) conclusion stock value method can be altered
The golden rule of stock accounting is that opportunity stock should all the time equal conclusion stock and nothing has changed in this regard.
However, this does not stop a breeder from changing the year end accounting stock valuation method.
For instance, if store selling value has been used in the past, this can be altered to use either the extra "write-off" or "cost" conclusion stock valuation methods. This strategy would help immensely in reducing dutible revenue in a single tax year, something that would be most welcome if you've been a victim of a natural disaster.
Example
Stockco was severely affected by a new outbreak of Ei virus that swept straight through the Hunter Valley, prominent to many of its prized yearlings being withdrawn from the 2012 Easter sales. However, good money was made on foals sold at the earlier Magic Millions Qld sales. Tax behalf for the year is 0,000.
Without the cash-flow from the Easter sales, Stockco requires options to sell out its tax behalf for Fy 2012. Martin the accountant finds that many of the mares have been valued @ store value as at 30 June 2011. By valuing these mares @ cost as at 30 June 2012, the conclusion stock value of the mares is reduced by 0,000 and tax behalf is also reduced by this estimate to 0,000 (0,000 less 0,000).
8. Issues re withdrawing funds from a Farm management Deposit (Fmd)
The Fmd provisions are contained in the tax act and broadly enable an eligible taxpayer to defer the revenue tax on dutible primary production (breeding) revenue from the revenue year in which a Fmd deposit is made (i.e. A deduction is available for such a deposit) until the Fmd deposit is repaid (i.e. This estimate is included in dutible revenue in the year of withdrawal).
However, a Fmd deposit (or part thereof) loses its status as a Fmd where it is withdrawn within 12 months of the deposit date. In these circumstances, a partial retirement of an Fmd means that only the residual deposit estimate qualifies as an Fmd, Provided the remaining estimate is ,000 or more and Provided that it stays in the list for at least 12 months.
The implication for a Fmd withdrawn within 12 months is the no deduction is available for the deposit (and taxpayers will need to ask an amended estimation where this rule effects a deduction claimed in the prior revenue year).
Tax Tip - Farm management Deposits withdrawn in exceptional circumstances
However, as an exception to this, a deposit retains it status as an Fmd even if it is withdrawn within 12 months where the taxpayer is in an area the priest Of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry has declared an "exceptional circumstances"' area. In this regard, Fmd deposit holders have until three months after the year of revenue of the retirement to gather an "exceptional circumstances"' certificate from the relevant state authority.
Example
Vanessa is a Victorian breeder who has a long history as a thriving breeder and in the Fy 2008 made 0,000 behalf from her activities.
To sell out her breeding behalf for Fy 2008, before year end she deposits 0,000 under the Fmd scheme, this reducing her dutible revenue to 0,000 (0,000 less 0,000).
Only a few months later, the bushfires destroy her asset and she now has urgent need for part of that 0,000 Fmd cash to help her in the rebuilding process.
Accordingly, she withdraws 0,000 of her Fmd in March 2009.
Under the normal Fmd rules, she must go back to the Ato and sell out her 2008 Fmd deduction by 0,000, increasing her 2008 dutible revenue to 0,000.
However, as the priest of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry has declared her breeding asset to be in an "exceptional circumstances"' area, and she has obtained her certificate within 3 months of the end of the tax year, she is still eligible to claim that 0,000 retirement is a deduction in 2008. This 0,000 retirement is declared as revenue in Fy 2009, the year of withdrawal.
You are welcome to sense me if you wish me to clarify or enlarge upon any of the matters raised in this article.
I hope you get new knowledge about State Farm Insurance. Where you can offer used in your evryday life. And most significantly, your reaction is more tips here State Farm Insurance|State Farm Insurance|"State Farm Insurance"|a knockout post State Farm Insurance}.Read more.. a knockout post Tax Tips For Horse business Disruptions in the Thoroughbred manufactures. View Related articles related to State Farm Insurance. I Roll below. I even have suggested my friends to help share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share Tax Tips For Horse business Disruptions in the Thoroughbred manufactures.
No comments:
Post a Comment